中国人民武装学院网

 找回密码
 加入人武网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
总共179条微博

动态微博

查看: 1037|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[英文报道]《2012》被评最“离谱” NASA评最烂科幻电影 [复制链接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2011-9-13 10:37:50 AM
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    居住地
     长沙市
    经验值
    148 个
    日志
    1
    跳转到指定楼层
    楼主
    发表于 2011-1-19 04:39:54 AM |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
    美国国家航空航天局(英文缩写为NASA)最近评选出七大最烂科幻电影,这次评选的目的是希望好莱坞导演拍片时,不要扭曲科学理论,要多注意情节合理性。而最终入选的电影包括《地心毁灭》、《世界末日》等,其中《2012》被评为最离谱的科幻电影。
      d& S& I! E# O# b  NASA的科学家认为,《2012》中所描述太阳风暴释放的微中子粒子,其实并不会造成地球核心加速升温,甚至引发地震、海啸以及陆地沉没等灾难。而NASA也褒扬拍得好的科幻电影,并认为影片《接触未来》中描述的利用无线电望远镜寻找外太空讯号的情节是行得通的。
    ; z( Q6 z& k5 j6 O' {/ |; A 5 C! y$ L& d7 \* K; R* B4 \) s
    相关英文报道:- z5 F3 c/ d$ u( R  c# w9 ?
    * S9 A4 [$ k/ {* U6 W3 o
    NASA experts say '2012' is the most absurd science-fiction film
    9 N" y, \3 y* [4 }1 e8 tRecently, NASA held a private meeting at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California in order to discuss many of the doomsday science-fiction motion pictures. They are urging Hollywood to produce more realistic films.
    5 W8 a, J+ H; x) H. F9 mFollowing the release of last year’s end of the world, doomsday Hollywood blockbuster, “2012,” NASA took the time to publish a Question and Answer period to discuss the whole 2012 phenomena and whether or not the world will end.
    ' n* U/ Q- H: `6 k2 WThe box office smash hit has also led NASA experts to label it as the most scientifically flawed science-fiction motion picture. During the day-long conference, NASA heads also pleaded for Hollywood studio heads to come up with more plausible and scientifically sound films.& c  s6 N* `1 C) {
    “The filmmakers took advantage of public worries about the so-called end of the world as apparently predicted by the Mayans of Central America, whose calendar ends on December 21, 2012,” said head of NASA’s near-earth asteroid rendezvous mission, Donald Yeomans, in an interview with the Australian. “The agency is getting so many questions from people terrified that the world is going to end in 2012 that we have had to put up a special website to challenge the myths. We have never had to do this before.”' r4 G+ s5 m/ ]7 l& v" p" }
    For those who are wondering why NASA is critiquing movies instead of searching for comets, alien planets and near-earth objects, the U.S. space agency argues that these films are forcing people to worry about non-existent problems.
    ! a6 L- I' y+ D  \: S4 XPrior to “2012,” NASA listed Michael Bay’s “Armageddon,” Hilary Swank’s “The Core,” Tommy Lee Jones’ “Volcano,” Arnold Schwarzenegger’s “The 6th Day” and Keanu Reeves’ “Chain Reaction” as the most scientifically flawed films.* |8 E7 |, `1 d3 p+ h9 n. T2 b
    However, not all sci-fi films are bad. NASA believes Ethan Hawke’s “Gattaca,” Ridley Scott’s “Blade Runner” and Ron Howard’s “Apollo 13” are scientifically “realistic.”
    9 n( _  J9 g2 k2 z3 BWhat will NASA say about Roland Emmerich’s next project? Emmerich will be producing an end of the world film called “2016: End of the Night.” It surrounds the story of Earth four years after its end.
    3 ?* r4 i  X* h( ?) b7 T" d5 E! Y) x4 \
    分享到: QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
    分享分享0 收藏收藏0 顶0 踩0

    使用道具 举报

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入人武网

    简洁论坛|训网传媒

    GMT+8, 2024-6-18 01:45 AM , Processed in 0.045656 second(s), 26 queries .

    System by Discuz! Powered by 5+7WorkRoom

    © 2008-2011 XunNets Inc.

    回顶部